The
workshop examined a variety of cultural texts (architecture, visual
representations, newspaper articles) in order to study the processes of
re-fashioning British identity at two historical moments: the Great Exhibition
in 1851 and the Millennium celebrations in 2000. It is assumed that societies
use monumental architecture to visualise dominant value systems and achieve
consensus for preferred social attitudes. As J. Z. Young said, “…the central
building of a community, from mound to cathedral, is in fact a means of
communication: it both organises and continues to express a common meaning by
which its people live.”
These central buildings serve as centres for public ritual through which
members of a community symbolically show both to themselves and to outsiders
what ideas about the world unite them and form the core of their culture. It
must be remembered, however, that in the process of exerting ‘hegemonic’
influences, the forces of incorporation struggle against the forces of
resistance of subordinate groups. Therefore, the dominant groups are not always
able to secure agreement about the ideas they put forward to the populace in
such symbolic forms as architecture or ritual.
The Crystal Palace was
built as the site of the Great Exhibition in 1851, the purpose of which was the
celebration of the achievements of Victorian Britain. It is considered to be
one of the most important architectural designs of the nineteenth century.
Undoubtedly, the Crystal Palace
contributed largely to the Exhibition’s success as a political and commercial
venture. It should be rewarding to compare and contrast the Great Exhibition
Hall with the Millennium Dome, the site of the Millennium celebrations in Britain in
2000.
The
Millennium project was intended as a way to provide a refreshed sense of
identity to the British after the great transformations of the 1980s and 1990s.
The British Prime Minister, Tony Blair said that “…the Dome has been built to
re-energise the nation, raise the self-esteem of its people and enhance the
nation’s standing.” The comparison
between the Crystal Palace and
the Millennium Dome is expected to make it easier for students to discern the
ideology which permeates the U.K.
celebrations of the year 2000 and draw conclusions about the current state of
British culture. It also reveals the dynamic nature of the present-day public
debate about British identity and the operations of different ideological
forces (the media, political and economic lobbies, the government).
The following class outline is intended to be used with students of
English at universities and Teacher Training Colleges, but it could be easily adapted for use in secondary schools, with
intermediate and upper-intermediate students. The advantage of choosing a
current topic like the Millennium celebrations is the possibility of continuous
development of the outline and inclusion of new materials as they appear. The
media are full of reports and updates about the Millennium project and the
Internet remains an easy source for a variety of materials (see Bibliography).
The present outline includes activities with sample questions and is followed
by Teacher’s Notes. It should be noted that the workshop has an open structure,
so the conclusions can (and should) differ enormously from one class taught to
another.
THE OUTLINE
Part I:
The Crystal Palace v. the Millennium Dome: interpreting
architecture
Activity
1
Working
in groups, fill in the gaps in the text:
The Crystal Palace was the central building of the
……………………….. . It opened on May 1, 1851 and closed ……………………….., having
accommodated ……………………….. visitors. Designed by ………………………..., who had been a
gardener for Duke of Devonshire, the Crystal Palace was the world’s first large
ferro-vitreous edifice (i.e. it was built out of
…………… and …………..). The Crystal Palace was also the first ……………………….. structure:
it was built of parts which were standardised, made in quantity and assembled
on site. It was built in ………………………... The Palace was ……………………….. feet long and
……………………….. feet wide and 100 feet high (compare to St. Peter’s 600’ long x
450’ wide). Inside, there were more than 13,000 exhibitors, and more than half
the area was occupied by British and ……………………….. exhibits, including engines,
textiles, glass, cutlery and jewels. The gate money, £365,000, was used
to purchase 35 hectares of land in South Kensington on which ……………………….. was built. The Palace was
……………………….. and ……………………… to Sydenham, in Kent. It ……………………….. in 1936.
Activity
2.
Study the
pictures of the Crystal Palace and answer the following questions.
Picture 1. The Crystal Palace perspective. 
Picture 2. Opening ceremonies with Queen Victoria. 
Picture 3. Exterior showing the steam
plant. 
Discussion Questions
What does the Crystal Palace remind you of?
If we treat
architecture as “text”, what connotations does the building produce?
If we assume that
the Crystal Palace was supposed to serve as a visual
representation of Britain in 1851, what images of Britain does it demonstrate?
What ‘Victorian
values’ did the building symbolise?
In what ways is
the structure supposed to demonstrate British industrial supremacy?
What idea of the
world order do the Exhibition and the architecture of the Crystal Palace promote?
What kind of
vision of the Empire is present here?
How could the
significance of ‘light’ be interpreted?
Activity
3.
Decide whether
these statements are true or false:
(1) The
Millennium Dome is the largest construction of its kind in the world. T F
(2) It was
built in the Docklands in London.
T F
(3) It was
opened on 1 January 2000 and
will be closed on 31
January 2000. T
F
(4) It is
over one kilometre in circumference and could contain the Wembley Stadium. T
F
(5) The
Dome is 50 times the floor area of that of St.
Paul’s Cathedral. T F
(6) The
idea of the Millennium Dome originated in John Major’s Conservative Cabinet in
1994. T F
(7) The
Dome project has already cost more than £700 million. T
F
(8) It is
financed by the taxpayers. T F
(9) The Dome
should be visited by at least 6 million people to bring profits to the
investors. T F
(10) It’s
very difficult to get tickets for the Millennium Dome. T F
Activity
4.
Study the
pictures of the Millennium Dome and answer the following questions.
Picture 4.
Source: http://www.greenwichletting.co.uk/dome.html
Picture 5.
Source: http://www.greenwichletting.co.uk/dome.html
Picture 6. Source: www.greenwichletting.co.uk/dome.html
Discussion Questions
What does the
Millennium Dome remind you of?
If we treat
architecture as “text”, what connotations does the building produce?
If
we assume that the Millennium Dome was supposed to serve as a visual
representation of Britain in 2000,
what images of Britain does it present?
What values does
the building stand for?
What is the
structure supposed to demonstrate about Britain’s position in the world?
How could the
significance of the notion of ‘time’ in
the location and structure of the building be interpreted?
Activity
4.
Study the picture
showing the zones inside the Dome and answer the following questions.
Picture 6.
Source: www.greenwich2000.com/millennium/dome/zones/index.htm
Picture 7.
Source: http://www.greenwichletting.co.uk/dome.html
Picture 8.
Source: www.greenwichletting.co.uk/dome.html
Discussion Questions
If one assumes
that the Dome is intended to represent Britain in the year 2000, what aspects of life are
emphasised in the way it is divided into zones? Are any areas of life missing?
For what purposes
is technology used in the Dome? How was it used in 1851?
What is the
meaning of the ‘British reality’ in the Millennium Dome?
Is there a
‘global’ aspect present here, corresponding to the ‘imperial’ connotations of
the Great Exhibition?
How are the
audience supposed to celebrate the Millennium through the Dome? How different
is this model of participation from the one promoted by the Great Exhibition of
1851?
Part
II: The Crystal Palace v. the Millennium Dome: interpreting the
rituals of public celebrations
Activity
5.
Read either the text describing the opening ceremonies in the Crystal Palace
or the article about the first night in the Millennium Dome and report it to
your partner who has read the other text.
Text
1:
London
Times 2 May 1851 ‘The Opening of the Great Exhibition’ (selected
extracts).
(....) The arteries of the great city,
surcharged with life, beat full and strong under the pressure of a great and
hitherto unknown excitement. (….) Never before was so vast a multitude
collected together within the memory of man. When swarms of people poured from
the loins of the north in a fierce migration, or when all the hosts of Asia
were spread broadcast over the plains of Europe, their largest masses were not
more numerous than the peaceful crowds who congregated around the great Temple
of Industry and the avenues which commanded a view of a new royal procession.
(….). Numerous as were the people, in the space of the park, and in their own
accommodating spirit, they found plenty of room, and with comparative comfort
they advanced in wave after wave, and carried on towards Kensington, or halted
before Buckingham Palace. Here two lines of police were formed which extended
to Hyde Park, along Rotten-tow, to the Exhibition, leaving a broad
drive for carriages with a good margin for pedestrians. (....) a
line of carriages swept past, and then came a troop of Life Guards at the trot,
and the voices of the people hailed the Queen again and again with hearty
cheers, as she came by bowing kindly and graciously. (....) The Queen seemed
full of emotion at the greatness of the occasion and at the welcome, but she
was soon lost within the walls of the Palace .… Presently loud cheers came from the interior
of the building; then the strains of
“God save the Queen” leaked out through its glass walls, and were repeated
by a few of the people; then solemn silence - again a fine burst of voices and
again a song of praise, then the roar of cannon from the Serpentine, the
murmuring voices of the vast hordes that crowded its shores, the national
Anthem again, the cheers repeated, and, after a visit of an hour, the Queen
reappeared at the threshold of the Exhibition again with the Prince by her
side, full of pride and happiness, and drove off amid the warm demonstrations
of her subjects to the palace. (...)
The pageant of the State opening within the Crystal Palace is over, and it remains
for us to describe it as best we can. That imposing ceremony was witnessed by
some 25,000 spectators, who will each have his own account to give, his own
tale to tell of its wonders. (....) At a very early hour they had
bestirred themselves, determined to be in time, and the consequence was that
long before 9 o’clock all the
doors of the Exhibition were besieged by a mob of ladies and gentlemen, who of
course rushed in with immense eagerness when at last allowed to do so.
(....) Her Majesty and the State procession were left to make their
progress between living walls of loyal subjects and admiring foreigners,
extending in long lines from one end of the building to the other. (....)
On her appearance the vast assemblage rose to welcome her, a burst of
enthusiastic cheering broke forth from every side - ladies waved their
handkerchiefs, gentlemen their hats, and the whole scene presented was one of
unusual splendour. The sun, too, for a moment emerged from the envious clouds
that for some time previously had dimmed his lustre, and a flood of light
pouring in through the glittering dome of the transept illuminated this
imposing spectacle of loyalty. When Her Majesty ascended the throne, attended
by the Royal family and the distinguished visitors of her Court, the organ of
Messrs. Gray and Davison pealed forth the notes of the National Anthem, and the
immense choir collected for the occasion accompanied the strain. This produced
a grand effect, and not a heart present could remain unmoved at a scene so
touching and so sublime. His Royal Highness Prince Albert, when the music had
ceased, joined the Royal commissioners, who drew near to the throne and read to
Her Majesty the .... report of the proceedings of the Commission
(....) His Royal Highness handed to Her Majesty a copy of the
report, accompanied by a catalogue of the articles exhibited.
Her Majesty
returned the following gracious answer:
- “(....) I cordially concur with you in the prayer, that by God's
blessing this undertaking may conduce to the welfare of my people and to the
common interests of the human race, by encouraging the arts of peace and
industry, strengthening the bonds of union among the nations of the earth, and
promoting a friendly and honourable rivalry in the useful exercise of those
faculties which have been conferred by a beneficent Providence for the good and
the happiness of mankind.”
His Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury
then approached the throne, and with great fervency of manner offered up the
.... prayer, invoking God's blessing on the undertaking (….). At the close of this prayer the choir joined
in singing the Hallelujah Chorus and the effect of this performance may be
estimated from the fact that the chapel royal, St. Paul’s Cathedral,
Westminster Abbey, and St. George's chapel, Windsor, contributed their entire
vocal strength, while there were also present pupils of the Royal Academy of
Music, part of the band of the Sacred Harmonic Society, and many other
performers, both foreign and English. (....) The procession then formed
.…. .
Turning to the right the procession moved
to the west end of the nave on the north side, and as it passed the glazed roof
of the building vibrated with enthusiastic cheers. ( .... ) The foreign
commissioners …. gazed with wonder at the development of British industry
by which they found themselves surrounded. The Indian and Colonial
collections were left behind, the Fine Arts’ Court passed, and the procession,
cheered incessantly in its progress, moved into the area devoted to our
many-featured manufacturing products. Glimpses were caught over the heads of
the spectators on the right of the Furniture
Court, and the massive forms of the fixed
machinery beyond it. (....) Past the furs of bears and other wild
animals suspended from many a girder, and carpets lending their brilliant
colours to complete the decorations and clothe the narrow lines of the
interior, the pageant swept on its way. (….) Then, wheeling round the model of
the Liverpool Docks, it was returning on the south side of the nave, when the
gigantic organ by Willis suddenly hurled forth its immense volume of sound.
(....) Displays of textile fabrics, of hardware, of cutlery and of furniture,
vistas of colours and alleys filled with the richest materials (...)
hardly claimed a moment's attention in that remarkable progress. Still upon the
mind the grand impression left was the magnificence of the general spectacle,
the loyalty of the great assemblage, the cordial understanding between the
Sovereign and the flower of her people - above all, the hearty union of all
classes in celebrating with becoming pomp this inauguration of a temple
dedicated to industry and peace. (….) The cheering and the
waving of hats and handkerchiefs went on continuously around the building, and
at last .... the Queen returned once more to the position in the transept where
her throne was placed. She looked exceedingly well, and bore the excitement of
the occasion with a firmness worthy of herself and of the people she governs.
The applause of the assemblage was acknowledged both by herself and the Prince
in the most gracious manner.
And now the
last act of the ceremonial remains to be recorded. The Marquis of Breadalbane, in a loud tone of voice, announced that the
Queen declared “the Exhibition open”. A flourish of trumpets proclaimed the
fact to the assembled multitudes. The royal family, attended by the Court,
withdrew from the building, the choir once more took up the strain of the
National Anthem, the barriers, which had hitherto restrained the spectators
within certain limits, were withdrawn, and the long-pent-up masses poured over
every part of the building, unrestrained by policemen, and eager to gratify
their curiosity.
Text
2:
Alan Hamilton, “Here’s to the
new millennium“, The Times 1 January 2000.
LIKE the shadow of the summer
eclipse, midnight rolls across the face of the earth at 775 mph. By the time
Big Ben tolled the magic hour in our little grapefruit segment of the globe,
the islanders of Kiribati in the Pacific had been partying for 14 hours.
When it came at last to the
headquarters of measured time at Greenwich we welcomed it, like our distant
ancestors, with goblins and fire. That the celebrations were essentially pagan
was appropriate enough; we were marking, not a religious milestone, but a round
number.
Eighteen seconds after passing the
meridian line, the notional midnight hour was deemed to have
reached Tower Bridge, when the Thames blazed to a curtain of fire
that followed midnight for a further 10.8 seconds
upriver to Big Ben. With 39 tonnes of explosives
involved, it formed part of the biggest fireworks display in British history,
although the music written by Handel for a previous one has proved more
enduring than some of last night’s offerings are likely to.
Fire figured last time, too. The sermon in
the Vercelli manuscript of 1000 predicting the first
millennium warned of resounding flames burning up the blood-mingled earth,
destroying all those engaged in great boasting and in the useless sight of gold
and silver, fine cloth and ill-gotten property. That preacher would not have
liked the £758 million Millennium Dome, which is where the goblins danced
last night.
In a 90-minute entertainment to which the
Queen, the Duke of Edinburgh and the Princess Royal were welcomed by Tony and
Cherie Blair, the only overtly religious element was a two-minute slot allotted
to the Archbishop of Canterbury and three Barnardo’s
children to say prayers.
The Queen wore an apricot coat, Cherie a
long purple dress, while between them in the royal box, the Prime Minister
sported his usual dark suit, glistening white shirt and red tie. As they took
their seats the last stragglers from the chaos of Stratford station were still struggling
to their places.
At a quarter to midnight the Queen
unhooked a rope on the royal box and released a group of children from the
Meridian Primary School in Greenwich who raced across the arena and grabbed
eight ribbons, causing a ring of curtains to fall away in a spectacular
waterfall effect, exposing the inside of the structure’s saucer roof. Martians
who gazed down on it from their planet appeared to be right; it will never fly.
The organisers
were particularly proud of an elaborate stunt shortly before midnight. As the young choristers
began to sing the anthem Sir John Tavener’s New Beginning, they approached centre
stage where the world's third largest diamond had been positioned to be
targeted by laser beams, creating the effect once produced by a rotating glass
ball in dance halls. As the delicate first notes sounded, they placed their
hands over the diamond to reduce the arena to darkness.
Finally, as the quarter chimes of Big Ben
sounded, tradition returned. The entire audience rose to its feet cheering. On
the midnight stroke the Queen and Mr
Blair toasted each other with champagne and within moments the monarch and her
first minister had linked hands with the entire front row of the royal box for Auld Lang Syne. The
Queen then gave her husband a rare public kiss.
And then, the goblins. Five hundred
dancers performed a carnival entitled Blueprints for Paradise; some hung on bungee ropes
from the roof. The dancers on the ground were costumed fantastically, from Tolkien out of Notting Hill
Carnival, gyrating through the three movements of Wisdom, Essence and Passion. What
it was all about was open to the widest speculation, but then the Dome itself
is the very essence of virtual reality rather than any philosophy, in this
secular age of Blairism, that you could actually get
your teeth into.
It may, in its strange way, have been
perfectly appropriate. The holy men of the first millennium regarded humanity
as a race of hobbits inhabiting a Middle Earth between heaven and hell, wiser
than cattle but lower than angels.
Since then, of course, we have had a
thousand years of progress, which means there are far more opportunities for
things to go wrong. The Millennium Wheel on the Thames was deemed unsafe on
Thursday, and 250 guests who had been looking forward to an inaugural ride had
to be content with a ground-based party and free British Airways tickets to a
destination of their choice. Tony Blair stopped by and opened it anyway.
The dampening threat of rain did little to
deter a tidal wave of revellers from pouring into Central London. As midnight approached, numbers were
estimated at more than two million spite of the real millennium bug, the epidemic
of colds and flu which has laid half the nation low.
At least the Queen followed tradition,
particularly her new one of paying more attention to the disadvantaged. She and
Prince Philip began their Millennium Eve with a visit to a Crisis hostel for
the homeless in Southwark Street, before making a brief
appearance at an all-night vigil in Southwark
Cathedral and lighting the first millennium candle.
Embarking on the Thames cruiser Millennium of Peace at Bankside Pier and
joined by the Princess Royal and her husband Commodore Tim Laurence, the Queen
sailed downriver like her ancestor George II enjoying his celebratory
fireworks. At Tower Bridge she paused to light a fuse to
fire a laser to ignite the Thames millennium beacon. But it took almost a minute to light the
torch which, in the wind and drizzle, was as reluctant as a sodden log fire.
Finally lit, it seemed to flicker and go out again before completing its task.
“I thought it had blown out,” the Queen said. Further downriver, as her launch
crossed the meridian line near Greenwich, the destroyer HMS Westminster was waiting to fire a
21-gun salute.
By 12.30, having
heard the Dome concert with a jazzed-up National Anthem, the Queen was on her
way back to the peace of Sandringham by car. And the shadow of midnight was racing across the Atlantic at 775 mph to an expectant New York.
Discussion Questions
What was the
order of the Great Exhibition’s opening ceremony?
Were there any
similar elements in the Millennium Dome celebrations?
What was
strikingly different?
In what ways did
“common people” participate in both events? Is the notion of the social class
significant?
Why was the Queen
present on both occasions? How different was her role in 2000?
Activity
6.
Text
3:
The Sunday Mirror, January 2, 2000, p. 3
Study
the page from Sunday Mirror. How is the Queen presented here? What do you think
is meant by the phrase “simple message of humanity”?
TEACHER’S
NOTES
Part I:
The Crystal Palace v. the Millennium Dome: interpreting
architecture
The aim of this part of
the class is to study architecture as meaningful texts. Architecture has its
own systems for coding meaning and it is the task of the students to get access
to them before they actually interpret the two buildings as texts. The
questions provided serve only to direct the students to certain areas of
interest. The materials offer many more opportunities for further analysis.
Activity
1
The purpose of this activity is to mobilise the students’ previous knowledge about the Great
Exhibition and/or provide them with the fundamental historical context for the
discussion.
Working
in groups, fill in the gaps in the text:
Model Answers:
The Crystal Palace was
the central building of the Great Exhibition. It opened on May 1, 1851 and
closed five months later, having accommodated about six million visitors.
Designed by John Paxton who had been a gardener for Duke of Devonshire, the Crystal Palace was
the world’s first large ferro-vitreous edifice (i.e.
it was built out of metal and glass).
The Crystal Palace was
also the first prefabricated structure: it was built of parts which were
standardised, made in quantity and assembled on site. It was built in less than
nine months. The Palace was 1848 feet long and 408 feet wide and 100 feet high
(compare to St. Peter’s 600’
long x 450’wide). Inside, there were more than 13,000 exhibitors, and more than
half the area was occupied by British and colonial exhibits, including engines,
textiles, glass, cutlery and jewels. The gate money, £365,000, was used
to purchase 35 hectares of land in South Kensington on
which a museum and college complex (the Science Museum, Victoria and Albert Museum, the
Imperial College of Science and Technology) was built. The Palace was dismantled
and moved
to Sydenham, in Kent. It was
destroyed by fire in 1936.
Activity
2
Sample
conclusions:
The Crystal Palace served to demonstrate British industrial supremacy, and as a running
commentary on the gospel of free trade and peace, and the virtues of democracy
and the British constitution. It promoted the vision of the civilising role of Britain
in the world. It was also a symbolic expression of the new emphasis on
practicality and functionality. It served to express the enlargement of
potential human powers, fulfilling the dream of bringing the tropics from the
colonies to Britain. The Great Exhibition served as an example of Britain’s
superior organisational capabilities. It was a widely acclaimed success, also
in financial terms.
Activity
3
The purpose of this activity is to mobilise the knowledge the students might have about the
Millennium Dome and/or provide them with the fundamental historical context for
the discussion.
Decide whether these
statements are true or false:
Model Answers:
- The
Millennium Dome is the largest construction of its kind in the world.
T
- It was built
in the Docklands in London. T
- It was opened
on 1 January 2000 and will be
closed on 31 January
2000. T
- It is over
one kilometre in circumference and could contain the Wembley Stadium
inside. T , F
- The Dome is
50 times the floor area of that of St. Paul’s
Cathedral. F
(The Dome is only 10
times the floor area of that of St. Paul’s Cathedral .)
- The idea of
the Millennium Dome originated in John Major’s Conservative Cabinet in
1994. T
- The Dome
project has already cost more than £ 700 million. T
- It is
financed by the taxpayers.T (?)
(The Dome has been
financed by money from the National Lottery profits.)
- The Dome
should be visited by at least 6 million people to bring profits to the
investors. F
(The initial estimate
was about 12 million visitors)
- It’s very
difficult to get tickets for the Millennium Dome. F
(At first it was not possible to buy tickets at the
gates. The policy was changed due to the disappointingly low attendance rates)
Activity
4
The objective here is to make the students talk freely about the
feelings that the building inspires in them. They should be able to discover
the ‘language’ by means of which architecture expresses meanings and then to
connect these meanings with social and political reality in Britain
today.
Activity
5
Both
texts are rather demanding. It would be a good idea to assign them for home
reading and begin with general reading comprehension questions and vocabulary
explanation before proceeding to the discussion. With students who are less
proficient in English, it will be difficult to discover all the various nuances
present in both texts, so it might be advisable to focus on the visual material
only.
Activity
6
The study of the Sunday Mirror pictures
should lead to further conclusions about the changing cultural role of the
monarch and the use of the monarchy and the Royal Family for endorsement of
current social values.
Sample
Conclusions:
1.
Both buildings serve symbolically to express a sense of Britishness
(what Britain is)
at key formative stages.
There
is a striking emphasis on technology, virtual reality, futurity and
globalisation in the Millennium
Dome. Even more importantly, there is an
emphasis on equality, especially equality in consumption, and the
principal model of social participation is entertainment.
2. The
structures and processes described above could be treated as elements in the
hegemonic process by
which the dominant class attempts to impose
a certain world view on other groups in society. The vision
advanced through the Millennium
Celebrations has to be negotiated with the people to whom it is offered.
The idea that the British Millennium should
be celebrated by means of a huge indoor theme park on which
almost £1 billion is spent does not
appeal to everyone. Right form the outset, there was a great deal of
criticism of the Millennium celebrations in
the British media. The belief in the British ability to “blaze a new
trail” has been threatened by the recurrent
technical problems (The Millennium Wheel, the queues on the
opening night, falling attendance rates).
It is at least ironic that the management of the NMEC was handed
over to a 34-year old Frenchman, a former Disneyland
executive.
Selected
bibliography (including Internet resources):
A. The Crystal Palace and
the Great Exhibition
Mitchell S. (Ed) 1988. Victorian Britain. An Encyclopedia. Chicago: St. James
Press
Yarwood D.
1987. A Chronology of Western
Architecture. New York: Facts on File Publications
http://soa.syr.edu/faculty/bcoleman/523/523.CrystalPalace.html
http://www.mcgill.ca/mchg/cp/vicdia.htm
B. The Millennium Dome
www.greenwich2000.com/millennium/dome/zones/index.htm
www.greenwichletting.co.uk/dome.html