|
British Studies Web Pages
HOME |
MAIL | EVENTS | INFO |
LINKS |
QUESTIONS |
MATERIALS
|
![]() |
|
Book Reviews | ||||||
|
Gaye Poole, Reel Meals, Set Meals: Food in Film and
Theatre, with foreword by Alan Saunders, published in 1999 by Currency
Press, Australia. ISBN 0 86819 578 2. About the author: Gaye Poole is an Australian
researcher, teacher and writer currently working at the University of New South
Wales, Sydney. She has been a successful theatre and television actor
performing in Hamlet, Equus, Butterflies are Free and many other productions. She visited Poland
in 2000 and was a keynote speaker at the conference Viands, Wines, and Spirits. Nourishment and (In)Digestion in the
Culture of Literacy, organised by the Institute of British and American
Culture and Literature, University of Silesia. In the academic year 2001/2 she
taught at the University of £ódŸ.
For an exclusive interview with Gaye Poole click here.
This book review has been written by Dr Anna Tomczak, who teaches British Studies at the University of Bialystok and is a regular contributor to our web pages. Probably nobody would still
claim that ‘food is just about eating’. In the era of various eating disorders,
with anorexia and bulimia discussed in many a popular magazine, and a growing
obsession with dieting and counting calories, in the consumer age when the
contents of food packets are taken seriously and read studiously, the subject
of food has gained special significance. It may seem that there is nothing
novel in this situation. Food has been of great interest to anthropologists,
sociologists and semiologists for many years. Over the decades special focus
has been placed on such aspects as: taste as a reflection of social and
cultural patterns and the cultural shaping of food preferences (Claude
Levi-Strauss, Pierre Bourdieu, Mary Douglas and Margaret Mead); the social
significance of commensality or food as a reflection of social relations;
relations for example of hierarchy and power (Bronis³aw Malinowski and Audrey
Richards); ceremonial uses of food in religion; the development of table
manners (Norbert Elias and Levi-Strauss); changes in the symbolic meaning of
food (David Riesman, Roland Barthes), to name but a few. Food is seen by scholars as a
means of expressing group identity and as a reflection of relationships with
other groups. Patterns of food consumption are indicative of ethnicity, class,
gender and age. Food may also be viewed with reference to such issues as
health, economy, hygiene, nutritional trends, technological progress, family
structure and the aesthetics of physique (greatly influenced by fashion).
However, food has also become a centrepiece of many mundane conversations had
by ordinary, humble folk. Is genetically modified food safe? Will the quality
of Polish food deteriorate once we become a member state of the European Union?
Which is better for your cholesterol level – butter or margarine? Are tomatoes
sold in supermarkets still tomatoes or only chemistry? People’s first associations
are to regard food as nourishment, not necessarily physical. The English
language is rich in metaphors suggestive of the figurative meaning of food. We
may talk of ‘food for thought’ or being ‘hungry for someone’s love’. People can
‘devour books’ or be ‘starved of sleep’. Such idioms as ‘eating humble pie’,
‘eating out of someone’s hand’ or a ‘dog-eat-dog situation’ do not concern the
physical nourishment of the body;
although originating in the phraseology of consumption, they concern far
deeper aspects of human behaviour than merely satisfying hunger. Food is an
aspect of culture and as such it reflects cultural identities: identities of
gender, nation, ethnic group or religious community. The meanings attached to
eating habits, table manners and food choices vary. They are conditioned by
time-specific and culture-specific attitudes, which are also a matter of taste,
upbringing and fashion. If one takes into account human attitudes to fasting,
it is clear that fasting acquires a different significance in Muslim
communities than in the Christian religion. The value of fasting in the sense
of depriving oneself of food, or a denial of certain foods, is not uniform. A
teenage girl who reduces her intake of food or removes from her diet such
snacks which she enjoys but considers calorie-rich, formally exercises an
attitude of fasting. Her motives, however, are very different from those of
Islamic societies during Ramadan. So if her objective in dieting is to lose
weight and look beautiful (which springs from vanity), if her fasting stems
from a self-centred desire to outshine her peers, does it lessen the value of
her fasting? Does it make her a less admirable or praiseworthy person than a
medieval hermit living on locusts and honey? Both practise self-denial, both
deprive their bodies of food; for different reasons, though. The answers to the
above questions would depend on who is answering and when. Human attitudes to
food and eating in western culture at the beginning of the twenty-first century
do not bear much resemblance to attitudes a few centuries earlier. What holds
equally true, however, for society in medieval Europe, contemporary America or
ancient China is that food’s function is not only satisfying hunger. There are
deep meanings attached to food, meanings dependent on time and place, meanings
which are constructed and decoded through cultural patterns. Decoding such meanings is the
subject of Gaye Poole’s book Reel Meals,
Set Meals: Food in Film and Theatre. As the note on the book cover informs
the reader: “Food has always been essential to the theatre and the cinema. A
catalyst which brings people together it can be used for dramatic
confrontation, as a comic device or even a metaphor for the meaning of life.
(...) [F]ood is a perfect vehicle for expressing the subject in drama and
comedy and for revealing intricate aspects about class, emotional states or
gender.” The book is divided into
eighteen chapters focusing on different uses of food in the film and theatre.
The subjects range from etiquette, civility and table manners to food taboos,
cannibalism and sex, with many an aspect in between (e.g. eating in
restaurants, food as a class marker, or women and food obsessions). Each
subject is discussed in detail and supported with quotations from various
interviews with actors and directors, film reviews and illustrations in the
form of film stills. There are over forty plays examined, from Aristophanes and
Seneca, through Marlowe and Shakespeare, to Patrick White and David Hare; and
more than a hundred films. The earliest films discussed are two 1914 films
directed by Charlie Chaplin: Caught in a
Cabaret and Dough and Dynamite,
the most recent – films made in the nineties such as Oliver Stone’s Natural Born Killers, Martin Scorsese’s Age of Innocence or Mike Leigh’s Secrets and Lies. The book has been written by
an Australian scholar and researcher and as well as discussing world famous
movies it also contains a lot of valuable information about Australian film and
theatre, less known to Polish readers. This is the book’s strength. The reader
will not only be able to recall famous food scenes from such classics as Peter
Greenaway’s The Cook, the Thief, His Wife
and Her Lover, Alfonso Arau’s Like
Water for Chocolate or Jonathan Demme’s The
Silence of the Lambs, all of which were immensely popular in Poland, but
will get a chance to learn about some specific Australian customs, for example,
‘the great outback Aussie barbecue’, or the belief that rabbit meat is
synonymous with a poor man’s meal. The reader will also get to know the stories
of many successful Australian movies. When necessary the scene is set with a
brief summary of the plot, so that examining a particular function of food in
the film is never obscure to the person who has not seen the movie. Gaye Poole, who teaches at
the University of New South Wales, has had a career as an actor, which explains
why the book contains so much insider’s knowledge – the knowledge, for example,
of logistical difficulties for the actors and the director that bringing food
onto the stage may create. When to chew, how to time the lines, how to observe
turn-taking in live theatre, is the food on stage real, what happens if the
audience is supposed to share the food with the actors – such questions are
answered in the chapter “Feeding the actors, feeding the audience”. The
author’s background also explains the meticulous attention paid to credits.
Each photograph in the book is accompanied by a detailed caption stating not
only the title of the film and the director’s name but the names of all the
actors seen in the still, the names of the characters that they are playing and
the name of the photographer. This, among other important aspects, makes the
book a reliable academic source. It has been well researched and the quoted
sources range from extremely influential titles, such as Mary Douglas’s Purity and Danger, Claude Levi-Strauss’s
The Savage Mind and The Raw and the Cooked or Norbert
Elias’s The Civilising Process and
eminent scholars (Erving Goffman, Elizabeth Grosz and Julia Kristeva) to
directors’ own memories (e.g. Woody Allen). The reader who happens to be
a cinema-goer will find pleasure in recalling particular memorable scenes from
different movies – Roxanne’s twenty-first birthday barbecue party in Mike
Leigh’s Secrets and Lies, Nicola
covered in Nutella chocolate paste in Life
is Sweet (also directed by Mike Leigh), the coffee shop scene in Quentin
Tarantino’s Pulp Fiction, or the
communal meal after the raising of the barn in Peter Weir’s Witness. The book helps to see some of these
best remembered scenes in a new light. It also makes the reader more sensitive
to the hidden meanings that one’s choice of food may reveal. So when you start wondering
what to order at a restaurant, remember what Brillat-Savarin wrote in his 1825
treatise: “Tell me what you eat, and I shall tell you what you are.” (Poole
1999: 1).
| ||||||